Top

Firefox Security? Here We Go Again

May 8, 2008

Firefox SecurityIt looks like there are some issues with the Firefox 2 Vietnamese Language Pack 2.0. According to bugzilla.mozilla.org, file contains malicious code. Language pack author PC was infected with the virus so it can’t directly affect you. However, you will still see banner ads.

I wonder if anyone from Mozilla is *really* running some checks before releasing add-ons and/or language packs to public…

News and Reviews about Your Favorite Web Browser. Subscribe to our RSS Feed.

Share and Enjoy (we know You want to): These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • Furl
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • Google
  • Live
  • Propeller
  • Reddit

Be the first to know. Subscribe to our RSS Feed.

Comments

4 Responses to “Firefox Security? Here We Go Again”

  1. Morbus on May 8th, 2008 10:57 am

    It’s not online anymore.

  2. Mip on May 8th, 2008 11:14 am

    “I wonder if anyone from Mozilla is *really* running some checks before releasing add-ons and/or language packs to public…”

    “Dave Miller (MoCo) 2008-05-06 10:49:42 PDT

    (In reply to comment #12)
    > I thought we were scanning all the uploads — did it slip by before the virus
    > definitions were updated to include HTML.Xorer?

    Yes, that was explained in comment 5.

    > Maybe we need to rescan after every definition update?

    Ideally, yes, except that we get new definitions on average every 6 hours or so
    and it takes over a week to virus scan the entire ftp server. Getting monthly
    scans is in the plan for the new stage server once we get it working.”

  3. Mozilla: For the Record » Blog Archive » Vietnamese Language Pack FAQ on May 9th, 2008 12:40 am

    […] Stan Schroeder,   The Inquisitr » Viruses Hit Mozilla, MP3s by JR Raphael,   FavBrowser » Firefox Security? Here We Go Again by Vygantas Lipskas,   Donna’s SecurityFlash » Compromised file in Vietnamese […]

  4. werwolf on May 12th, 2008 2:53 am

    The virus, was only indirectly in the package, right? Thats why it was not possible to discover it.

Got something to say?





Bottom