<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wow! Lunascape Beats Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Opera**</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.favbrowser.com/wow-lunascape-beats-chrome-firefox-safari-opera/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/wow-lunascape-beats-chrome-firefox-safari-opera/</link>
	<description>Web Browser News and Reviews.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:39:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MaxSteiner</title>
		<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/wow-lunascape-beats-chrome-firefox-safari-opera/#comment-136811</link>
		<dc:creator>MaxSteiner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 15:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.favbrowser.com/?p=1007#comment-136811</guid>
		<description>Gotta be honest the thing that pisses me off about Lunascape is the fact that it redirects you to their search.
Really obtrusive and shameface as far as Im concerned.
(tend to use it in Gecko or webkit, and no matter how much res it used it was always half of the new &#039;improved&#039; firefox :P)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gotta be honest the thing that pisses me off about Lunascape is the fact that it redirects you to their search.<br />
Really obtrusive and shameface as far as Im concerned.<br />
(tend to use it in Gecko or webkit, and no matter how much res it used it was always half of the new &#8216;improved&#8217; firefox :P)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daddylo</title>
		<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/wow-lunascape-beats-chrome-firefox-safari-opera/#comment-125096</link>
		<dc:creator>daddylo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 20:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.favbrowser.com/?p=1007#comment-125096</guid>
		<description>What layout you use, trident or webkit or gecko ?
I noticed it used more ram in Webkit ......
There beta version is out.
User interfrace needs improvment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What layout you use, trident or webkit or gecko ?<br />
I noticed it used more ram in Webkit &#8230;&#8230;<br />
There beta version is out.<br />
User interfrace needs improvment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MaxSteiner</title>
		<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/wow-lunascape-beats-chrome-firefox-safari-opera/#comment-125080</link>
		<dc:creator>MaxSteiner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 18:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.favbrowser.com/?p=1007#comment-125080</guid>
		<description>And it&#039;s consuming 2/3 of the system resources that the latest firefox was consuming!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And it&#8217;s consuming 2/3 of the system resources that the latest firefox was consuming!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MaxSteiner</title>
		<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/wow-lunascape-beats-chrome-firefox-safari-opera/#comment-125079</link>
		<dc:creator>MaxSteiner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 18:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.favbrowser.com/?p=1007#comment-125079</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve just switched to Lunascape 6 after finally having to give up on Firefox (20 crashes in 4 hours isn&#039;t a usable browser experience!).

Gotta say im very impressed with Lunascape, hasn&#039;t crashed on me yet, and its pretty dang quick!

(this browser things getting as bitchy as the 8bit format wars if you&#039;re asking me, lots of opera fanatics trying to shit on anything that isn&#039;t their chosen savior :P)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just switched to Lunascape 6 after finally having to give up on Firefox (20 crashes in 4 hours isn&#8217;t a usable browser experience!).</p>
<p>Gotta say im very impressed with Lunascape, hasn&#8217;t crashed on me yet, and its pretty dang quick!</p>
<p>(this browser things getting as bitchy as the 8bit format wars if you&#8217;re asking me, lots of opera fanatics trying to shit on anything that isn&#8217;t their chosen savior :P)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art</title>
		<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/wow-lunascape-beats-chrome-firefox-safari-opera/#comment-109533</link>
		<dc:creator>Art</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 03:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.favbrowser.com/?p=1007#comment-109533</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the info I will surely try this lunascape browser and test it  on different websites</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the info I will surely try this lunascape browser and test it  on different websites</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: memoryhoghater</title>
		<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/wow-lunascape-beats-chrome-firefox-safari-opera/#comment-109096</link>
		<dc:creator>memoryhoghater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 23:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.favbrowser.com/?p=1007#comment-109096</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;well all i can say ..the advantage of triple engine = triple memory hog..so no way hosey&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>well all i can say ..the advantage of triple engine = triple memory hog..so no way hosey</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene Donaghy</title>
		<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/wow-lunascape-beats-chrome-firefox-safari-opera/#comment-62271</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene Donaghy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 20:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.favbrowser.com/?p=1007#comment-62271</guid>
		<description>OOps would like to clarify I would like to add the WebKit and Gecko rendering engines to Lunascape downloading them and then installing offline is there is any easy way of doing this 

Eugene</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OOps would like to clarify I would like to add the WebKit and Gecko rendering engines to Lunascape downloading them and then installing offline is there is any easy way of doing this </p>
<p>Eugene</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene Donaghy</title>
		<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/wow-lunascape-beats-chrome-firefox-safari-opera/#comment-62270</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene Donaghy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 20:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.favbrowser.com/?p=1007#comment-62270</guid>
		<description>would like to install it but am on dial up is there any easy way of downloading the plugins and installing them offline</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>would like to install it but am on dial up is there any easy way of downloading the plugins and installing them offline</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charith de silva</title>
		<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/wow-lunascape-beats-chrome-firefox-safari-opera/#comment-49579</link>
		<dc:creator>charith de silva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 13:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.favbrowser.com/?p=1007#comment-49579</guid>
		<description>Alexodius

Compatibility , plz acid 3 test is the test that shows , do you follow web standards or not.

mono, I

(which Java script test you use )
 don&#039;t know what&#039;s wrong with you Jvascript speed testing becausewhen I&#039;m check is Lunascape brake it&#039;s official speed.

Anybody feel free to challenge me , I know about Lunascape browser well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alexodius</p>
<p>Compatibility , plz acid 3 test is the test that shows , do you follow web standards or not.</p>
<p>mono, I</p>
<p>(which Java script test you use )<br />
 don&#8217;t know what&#8217;s wrong with you Jvascript speed testing becausewhen I&#8217;m check is Lunascape brake it&#8217;s official speed.</p>
<p>Anybody feel free to challenge me , I know about Lunascape browser well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mono indeed</title>
		<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/wow-lunascape-beats-chrome-firefox-safari-opera/#comment-49549</link>
		<dc:creator>mono indeed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 05:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.favbrowser.com/?p=1007#comment-49549</guid>
		<description>i did some of my own tests opening real web pages, it was latest ff3 vs lunascape with firefox&#039;s machine. Fire =fox was faster each time. I have found that the thing you can do to ff (about:config) can be done to the lunascape so perhaps if you changed it to the same setting ass my ff it would be as fast. cant see how a third party can use an engine faster than the developers. 
Personally i&#039;m happy to use ff3 and use IE8 whenever i have a combatability problem. 
And the constent new updates im am forced to have on my lunascape annoys me- i&#039;ll stick with ff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i did some of my own tests opening real web pages, it was latest ff3 vs lunascape with firefox&#8217;s machine. Fire =fox was faster each time. I have found that the thing you can do to ff (about:config) can be done to the lunascape so perhaps if you changed it to the same setting ass my ff it would be as fast. cant see how a third party can use an engine faster than the developers.<br />
Personally i&#8217;m happy to use ff3 and use IE8 whenever i have a combatability problem.<br />
And the constent new updates im am forced to have on my lunascape annoys me- i&#8217;ll stick with ff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

