<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Web Inspector Receives an Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.favbrowser.com/web-inspector-receives-an-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/web-inspector-receives-an-update/</link>
	<description>Web Browsers News and Reviews.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 23:56:42 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: nobody</title>
		<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/web-inspector-receives-an-update/comment-page-1/#comment-77824</link>
		<dc:creator>nobody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 05:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.favbrowser.com/?p=3167#comment-77824</guid>
		<description>firebug works, does not slow entire browser down and does not need reload to start debugging. yes, youd probably say, that it is also quite older, yes. but firebug in the age of dragonfly now was MORE powerfull that dragonfly is now. and it waas written by only one man.

and it uses parts written in c - hooks to the engine. only interface is in JS. dragonfly does everything in JS. and is ugly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>firebug works, does not slow entire browser down and does not need reload to start debugging. yes, youd probably say, that it is also quite older, yes. but firebug in the age of dragonfly now was MORE powerfull that dragonfly is now. and it waas written by only one man.</p>
<p>and it uses parts written in c &#8211; hooks to the engine. only interface is in JS. dragonfly does everything in JS. and is ugly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Foo</title>
		<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/web-inspector-receives-an-update/comment-page-1/#comment-77606</link>
		<dc:creator>Foo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 11:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.favbrowser.com/?p=3167#comment-77606</guid>
		<description>For those interested, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.softwareishard.com/blog/firebug/eventbug-alpha-released/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;inspecting event listeners are available as an extension to Firebug&lt;/a&gt;. Though, the required API is only available in the Firefox 3.7 trunk, but they&#039;re &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.getfirebug.com/2009/10/30/event-listener-view-for-firebug/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;testing the functionality in an effort to get it into Fx 3.6&lt;/a&gt; and I&#039;d guess mainline Firebug too (i.e. not as an extension).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those interested, <a href="http://www.softwareishard.com/blog/firebug/eventbug-alpha-released/" rel="nofollow">inspecting event listeners are available as an extension to Firebug</a>. Though, the required API is only available in the Firefox 3.7 trunk, but they&#8217;re <a href="http://blog.getfirebug.com/2009/10/30/event-listener-view-for-firebug/" rel="nofollow">testing the functionality in an effort to get it into Fx 3.6</a> and I&#8217;d guess mainline Firebug too (i.e. not as an extension).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thoe</title>
		<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/web-inspector-receives-an-update/comment-page-1/#comment-77564</link>
		<dc:creator>Thoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 22:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.favbrowser.com/?p=3167#comment-77564</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s funny how you can&#039;t make a single comment anywhere, ever, without bashing Opera. It&#039;s as if your whole existence is about bashing Opera.

Quite pathetic, really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s funny how you can&#8217;t make a single comment anywhere, ever, without bashing Opera. It&#8217;s as if your whole existence is about bashing Opera.</p>
<p>Quite pathetic, really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thoe</title>
		<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/web-inspector-receives-an-update/comment-page-1/#comment-77563</link>
		<dc:creator>Thoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 22:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.favbrowser.com/?p=3167#comment-77563</guid>
		<description>Yes, who cares about security?

Also, let&#039;s conveniently ignore the fact that Firebug is doing the same thing as Dragonfly. Firebug is not exactly written in C++!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, who cares about security?</p>
<p>Also, let&#8217;s conveniently ignore the fact that Firebug is doing the same thing as Dragonfly. Firebug is not exactly written in C++!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nobody</title>
		<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/web-inspector-receives-an-update/comment-page-1/#comment-77258</link>
		<dc:creator>nobody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.favbrowser.com/?p=3167#comment-77258</guid>
		<description>and opera, after almost one year long wait had released new dragonfly - main new feature? improved element higlight.

f.. amazing :)

dragonfly is still THE crappiest tool i&#039;ve ever seen - flawed from bottom (pure javascript debugging javascript.. lol) trough paranoid security model ending with the worst interface and user experience in entire development history.. and what we got? new element highlight, oh yes..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and opera, after almost one year long wait had released new dragonfly &#8211; main new feature? improved element higlight.</p>
<p>f.. amazing :)</p>
<p>dragonfly is still THE crappiest tool i&#8217;ve ever seen &#8211; flawed from bottom (pure javascript debugging javascript.. lol) trough paranoid security model ending with the worst interface and user experience in entire development history.. and what we got? new element highlight, oh yes..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafael</title>
		<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/web-inspector-receives-an-update/comment-page-1/#comment-77218</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.favbrowser.com/?p=3167#comment-77218</guid>
		<description>Cool, the different way of displaying the colors names are interesting, various options to the &quot;user&quot;. ^^</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool, the different way of displaying the colors names are interesting, various options to the &#8220;user&#8221;. ^^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/web-inspector-receives-an-update/comment-page-1/#comment-77216</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.favbrowser.com/?p=3167#comment-77216</guid>
		<description>Still no line numbers for the styles in the style sheets. I use those line numbers every day at work to quickly find styles using &quot;go to line&quot; in my editor. Until the other DOM inspectors implement this feature, firebug will continue it&#039;s reign as supreme.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still no line numbers for the styles in the style sheets. I use those line numbers every day at work to quickly find styles using &#8220;go to line&#8221; in my editor. Until the other DOM inspectors implement this feature, firebug will continue it&#8217;s reign as supreme.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
