<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Only the 4.13% Of the Web Is Standards Compliant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.favbrowser.com/only-the-413-of-the-web-is-standards-compliant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/only-the-413-of-the-web-is-standards-compliant/</link>
	<description>Web Browser News and Reviews.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:39:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tiago Sá</title>
		<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/only-the-413-of-the-web-is-standards-compliant/#comment-43293</link>
		<dc:creator>Tiago Sá</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 13:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.favbrowser.com/?p=818#comment-43293</guid>
		<description>Standard is standard. If all go by it, then it&#039;s a good thing. If nobody goes by it, then it&#039;s irrelevant. Thing is, most sites try to go by the standards, and I&#039;m sore a very bug percentage of those which are not standard compliant are very close. My site, for example, is nearly standard compliant, except for a few javascript hacks for IE and Opera, and the absence of alt attributes in some images. The CSS though, is error-free. Also, I use AJAX :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Standard is standard. If all go by it, then it&#8217;s a good thing. If nobody goes by it, then it&#8217;s irrelevant. Thing is, most sites try to go by the standards, and I&#8217;m sore a very bug percentage of those which are not standard compliant are very close. My site, for example, is nearly standard compliant, except for a few javascript hacks for IE and Opera, and the absence of alt attributes in some images. The CSS though, is error-free. Also, I use AJAX :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Foo</title>
		<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/only-the-413-of-the-web-is-standards-compliant/#comment-43278</link>
		<dc:creator>Foo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 10:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.favbrowser.com/?p=818#comment-43278</guid>
		<description>Also, even if I hate flash, it&#039;s not bad per-se as long as you have some form of fall-back. Also, it&#039;s not until recently that proper support for audio/video in browsers has started to appear.
Also, the code being &quot;valid&quot; doesn&#039;t really say much about its quality. Just having a bunch of nested s isn&#039;t any better than using tables...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, even if I hate flash, it&#8217;s not bad per-se as long as you have some form of fall-back. Also, it&#8217;s not until recently that proper support for audio/video in browsers has started to appear.<br />
Also, the code being &#8220;valid&#8221; doesn&#8217;t really say much about its quality. Just having a bunch of nested s isn&#8217;t any better than using tables&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vygantas Lipskas</title>
		<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/only-the-413-of-the-web-is-standards-compliant/#comment-43274</link>
		<dc:creator>Vygantas Lipskas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 09:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.favbrowser.com/?p=818#comment-43274</guid>
		<description>I actually find this study irrelevant. W3 strict mode shows errors when you are not using alt tags, using target attribute, etc. etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually find this study irrelevant. W3 strict mode shows errors when you are not using alt tags, using target attribute, etc. etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

