Comments on: Internet Explorer 64 bit (x64) vs. 32 bit (x86)

By: Mgcouill

Mgcouill — Tue, 19 Apr 2011 21:07:00 +0000

best i needed

By: Internet Explorer 9 – 64-bit vs. 32-bit – Part 4: Speed - 4sysops

Internet Explorer 9 – 64-bit vs. 32-bit – Part 4: Speed - 4sysops — Sat, 25 Dec 2010 00:22:27 +0000

[...] In most of the disciplines, IE 9 64-bit outpaced IE 9 32-bit by far. The same guys ran a comparable test with IE 7 64-bit and 32-bit a while back. The results are similar, although it appears to me the [...]

By: cbuisr

cbuisr — Wed, 10 Nov 2010 16:41:22 +0000

If you’re using the browser to surf the net and to do some online bills then 32 bit is fine. 64 bit would be for the IT geeks (not in a bad way) who is always wanting a better benchmark number despite you can’t really tell the difference attimes.

By: Patrick Dreier

Patrick Dreier — Sun, 06 Jun 2010 20:25:13 +0000

Hello!

Internet Explorer 64-bit Edition and Internet Explorer 32-bit Edition have do not separeted folders for Active X elements.

By: Patrick Dreier

Patrick Dreier — Sun, 06 Jun 2010 20:20:01 +0000

Hello!

The Internet Explorer 64-bit Edition open Windows Update switching Internet Explorer 32-bit Edition.
I think the Statstik is not complet.
I think i am not this is a manipulation.
I think statistical errors because many points are failed.

By: Patrick Dreier

Patrick Dreier — Sun, 06 Jun 2010 20:08:49 +0000

Internet Explorer 64-bit Edition Active X elements of Internet Explorer 64-bit Edition are failed.
Adobe Downloader existing laters.
Internet Explorer 32-bit Edition Active X elements are existing.
Internet Explorer 64-bit Edition are not standard webbrowser.
Internet Explorer 32-bit Edition is a standard webbrowser.
old Sun JRE 64-bit Edition are not existing and the Sun Java 32-bit Edition support are finised.
Sun Java -bit Edition coming later.

By: Peter

Peter — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:04:46 +0000

One sensible, if a little rude, answer here. You can draw blue lines as long as an AOL “waiting to download line”, it does not change the results. Only the difference between the numbers matter. Well, actually, none of it matters. If you have a 64 bit system, use the 64 bit IE, why not it’s free and does, presumably, work slightly better.

By: sam

sam — Sun, 28 Feb 2010 23:53:36 +0000

as previously stated, graphs are dumb and misleading, this article will probably have a net effect of misleading the audience as a whole.

By: Dave

Dave — Sun, 07 Jun 2009 21:41:16 +0000

Thank you for pointing this out, because after reading the comments on this page I went back and looked at the graphs again and realized that there wasn’t NEAR the differences as I orignally thought there was. I guess I just assumed the graph originated from 0. I didn’t even notice until you pointed it out. Once I realized that the graphs are only showing the tail-end of the data, I got what I came here for. :)

By: Dave

Dave — Sun, 07 Jun 2009 21:33:29 +0000

To: Erik

Actually, being literate has nothing to do with it. Insulting people’s intelligence doesn’t make you appear any smarter, and if it makes you feel better, I pity you.

Fact is, the people who made their points here obviously CAN read, or they wouldn’t have known there was anything confusing about it.

My suggestion is that the poster might include a iconic graph that is started from 0 as suggested by many here, and place it above the blown up graphs that were obviously used to show the more detailed data.

This way even a novice such as myself can look at it quickly and learn what we came here to learn instead of only people who are “literate”.