<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox Receives New Logo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.favbrowser.com/firefox-receives-new-logo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/firefox-receives-new-logo/</link>
	<description>Web Browser News and Reviews.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: FFF</title>
		<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/firefox-receives-new-logo/#comment-63041</link>
		<dc:creator>FFF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 07:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.favbrowser.com/?p=2034#comment-63041</guid>
		<description>Very nice!
It&#039;s much &quot;crispier&quot; and better outlined at lower resolutions now, while having some nice details at higher resolutions.
The old one looks blurry in comparison.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice!<br />
It&#8217;s much &#8220;crispier&#8221; and better outlined at lower resolutions now, while having some nice details at higher resolutions.<br />
The old one looks blurry in comparison.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/firefox-receives-new-logo/#comment-62858</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 22:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.favbrowser.com/?p=2034#comment-62858</guid>
		<description>https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox3.5/Logos

Why didn&#039;t they add the updated logo in the post?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox3.5/Logos" rel="nofollow">https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox3.5/Logos</a></p>
<p>Why didn&#8217;t they add the updated logo in the post?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vygantas Lipskas</title>
		<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/firefox-receives-new-logo/#comment-62804</link>
		<dc:creator>Vygantas Lipskas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 06:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.favbrowser.com/?p=2034#comment-62804</guid>
		<description>http://www.favbrowser.com/firefox-35-to-feature-new-logo-3-versions-so-far/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.favbrowser.com/firefox-35-to-feature-new-logo-3-versions-so-far/" rel="nofollow">http://www.favbrowser.com/firefox-35-to-feature-new-logo-3-versions-so-far/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ahcheong</title>
		<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/firefox-receives-new-logo/#comment-62785</link>
		<dc:creator>ahcheong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 00:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.favbrowser.com/?p=2034#comment-62785</guid>
		<description>nice logo...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice logo&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomass</title>
		<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/firefox-receives-new-logo/#comment-62771</link>
		<dc:creator>tomass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.favbrowser.com/?p=2034#comment-62771</guid>
		<description>so what&#039;s different?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so what&#8217;s different?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

