<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox &#8211; Browser with the Most Disclosed Vulnerabilities</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.favbrowser.com/firefox-browser-with-the-most-disclosed-vulnerabilities/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/firefox-browser-with-the-most-disclosed-vulnerabilities/</link>
	<description>Web Browser News and Reviews.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:39:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 보안 취약점에 가장 많이 노출된 IE와 ActiveX (Secunia 2008 Report) &#124; 모바일로 여는 세상 - anytime, anywhere</title>
		<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/firefox-browser-with-the-most-disclosed-vulnerabilities/#comment-56730</link>
		<dc:creator>보안 취약점에 가장 많이 노출된 IE와 ActiveX (Secunia 2008 Report) &#124; 모바일로 여는 세상 - anytime, anywhere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 03:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.favbrowser.com/?p=1457#comment-56730</guid>
		<description>[...] Vygantas Lipskas님 글 Firefox - Browser with the Most Disclosed Vulnerabilities @ 2009.4.15에서 Secunia 2008 보고서에 대한 소개가 있고, 보고서 파일의 링크도 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Vygantas Lipskas님 글 Firefox &#8211; Browser with the Most Disclosed Vulnerabilities @ 2009.4.15에서 Secunia 2008 보고서에 대한 소개가 있고, 보고서 파일의 링크도 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Subair</title>
		<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/firefox-browser-with-the-most-disclosed-vulnerabilities/#comment-56311</link>
		<dc:creator>Subair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.favbrowser.com/?p=1457#comment-56311</guid>
		<description>God bless all of you that wrote opera 9.0 &amp; 4.2, for you guys are our messiah our so called foreigner service provider nearly kill us with thei connection charges. But with opera life is worth living. Pls send me the latest opera for pc connection cause 9.0 version is no more browsing without per pay</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God bless all of you that wrote opera 9.0 &amp; 4.2, for you guys are our messiah our so called foreigner service provider nearly kill us with thei connection charges. But with opera life is worth living. Pls send me the latest opera for pc connection cause 9.0 version is no more browsing without per pay</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/firefox-browser-with-the-most-disclosed-vulnerabilities/#comment-55881</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 12:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.favbrowser.com/?p=1457#comment-55881</guid>
		<description>cz ff also didnt had that one counted</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cz ff also didnt had that one counted</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TTT</title>
		<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/firefox-browser-with-the-most-disclosed-vulnerabilities/#comment-55871</link>
		<dc:creator>TTT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 12:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.favbrowser.com/?p=1457#comment-55871</guid>
		<description>Speaking of IE, how come &lt;a href=&quot;http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21672/?task=advisories_2009&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;IE8 have 0 vulnerabilities according to secunia&lt;/a&gt;, remember that contest?
Also, since when does &lt;a href=&quot;http://secunia.com/advisories/product/12366/?task=advisories_2008&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;11&lt;/a&gt;+&lt;a href=&quot;http://secunia.com/advisories/product/11/?task=advisories_2008&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;13&lt;/a&gt;+&lt;/a&gt;9&lt;/a&gt; add up to 31? Am I missing something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of IE, how come <a href="http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21672/?task=advisories_2009" rel="nofollow">IE8 have 0 vulnerabilities according to secunia</a>, remember that contest?<br />
Also, since when does <a href="http://secunia.com/advisories/product/12366/?task=advisories_2008" rel="nofollow">11</a>+<a href="http://secunia.com/advisories/product/11/?task=advisories_2008" rel="nofollow">13</a>+9 add up to 31? Am I missing something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan Wolter</title>
		<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/firefox-browser-with-the-most-disclosed-vulnerabilities/#comment-55864</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan Wolter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 11:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.favbrowser.com/?p=1457#comment-55864</guid>
		<description>This is from Secunia&#039;s annual report to it&#039;s customers.  The purpose of that report is to toot Secunia&#039;s horn by boasting about all the vulnerabilities they have reported. They don&#039;t disclose enough about what is being counted for anyone to assess the actual meaning of these numbers or draw any conclusions at all from them.  In fact, they are obviously nonsensical.  Does anyone really believe that in all the Firefox extensions together there is only one vulnerability?  This is meaningless smoke from Secunia&#039;s marketing department, and to draw any conclusion about any browser from it is absurd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is from Secunia&#8217;s annual report to it&#8217;s customers.  The purpose of that report is to toot Secunia&#8217;s horn by boasting about all the vulnerabilities they have reported. They don&#8217;t disclose enough about what is being counted for anyone to assess the actual meaning of these numbers or draw any conclusions at all from them.  In fact, they are obviously nonsensical.  Does anyone really believe that in all the Firefox extensions together there is only one vulnerability?  This is meaningless smoke from Secunia&#8217;s marketing department, and to draw any conclusion about any browser from it is absurd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vygantas Lipskas</title>
		<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/firefox-browser-with-the-most-disclosed-vulnerabilities/#comment-55858</link>
		<dc:creator>Vygantas Lipskas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 11:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.favbrowser.com/?p=1457#comment-55858</guid>
		<description>Scorpion,

While I agree on your point. IE has even more market share.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scorpion,</p>
<p>While I agree on your point. IE has even more market share.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scorpion</title>
		<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/firefox-browser-with-the-most-disclosed-vulnerabilities/#comment-55856</link>
		<dc:creator>Scorpion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 11:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.favbrowser.com/?p=1457#comment-55856</guid>
		<description>*shakes head* @ opera fan boys so ignorant and stuck up in their own little world. the article is damn joke, while Firefox is far from perfect at least Firefox corrects the issue and get&#039;s it done. see Firefox 3.0.8 emergency release as an example.

if opera had a big of a market share as Firefox, they would getting hit as hard 
as Firefox has. point is the vulnerabilities get&#039;s fixed by Firefox on their end, it&#039;s funny the article doesn&#039;t mention that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*shakes head* @ opera fan boys so ignorant and stuck up in their own little world. the article is damn joke, while Firefox is far from perfect at least Firefox corrects the issue and get&#8217;s it done. see Firefox 3.0.8 emergency release as an example.</p>
<p>if opera had a big of a market share as Firefox, they would getting hit as hard<br />
as Firefox has. point is the vulnerabilities get&#8217;s fixed by Firefox on their end, it&#8217;s funny the article doesn&#8217;t mention that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TTT</title>
		<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/firefox-browser-with-the-most-disclosed-vulnerabilities/#comment-55825</link>
		<dc:creator>TTT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 07:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.favbrowser.com/?p=1457#comment-55825</guid>
		<description>This is just vulnerabilities that have been found AND have been disclosed by the vendor. It doesn&#039;t really say anything about the security of the browser.
Also, the safest browser is most definitely lynx or nc :P

@Tiago Sá
They also have this strange thing with &quot;bundling&quot; vulnerability reports going, which makes the counting even more unreliable :-/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just vulnerabilities that have been found AND have been disclosed by the vendor. It doesn&#8217;t really say anything about the security of the browser.<br />
Also, the safest browser is most definitely lynx or nc :P</p>
<p>@Tiago Sá<br />
They also have this strange thing with &#8220;bundling&#8221; vulnerability reports going, which makes the counting even more unreliable :-/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: werwolf</title>
		<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/firefox-browser-with-the-most-disclosed-vulnerabilities/#comment-55763</link>
		<dc:creator>werwolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.favbrowser.com/?p=1457#comment-55763</guid>
		<description>I hope it is clear to everybody that Opera is the most secure browser on Earth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope it is clear to everybody that Opera is the most secure browser on Earth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mancho</title>
		<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/firefox-browser-with-the-most-disclosed-vulnerabilities/#comment-55750</link>
		<dc:creator>Mancho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 23:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.favbrowser.com/?p=1457#comment-55750</guid>
		<description>This also says nothing to how severe the vulnerabilites are, as well as how quickly they are fixed.  And since ActiveX is not so much a plugin as it is basic IE functionality, it really speaks more to how worthless IE is than FF.  Oh, and Opera FTW!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This also says nothing to how severe the vulnerabilites are, as well as how quickly they are fixed.  And since ActiveX is not so much a plugin as it is basic IE functionality, it really speaks more to how worthless IE is than FF.  Oh, and Opera FTW!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

