Anyone know how to download youtube video in Opera Using IDM???

Thanks.

as far as i know, opera still obeys some 3rd party patents, that prevents loading embeded content ‘on the fly’.

there was a time, when all non-ie browsers obeyed it, but after some time all, except for opera, started to ignore it (or bypass it on some way)

turbo or not, you cant play embeded youtube video with ONE click, you first have to ‘activate’ it.

Are you using Opera turbo because that play like button is for flash content

http://www.indowebster.com/Mobile_Suit_Gundam_00_01_1280×720_H264_AACmp4.html

the download link is a flash button also, the click to flash is to save bandwidth while using Opera tubro

I am confused between Opera10.10 or Fx3.6.
At first, i’m a fans of opera. It’s because it feels faster than Fx. Moreover, Opera can show us the network speed and percentage loading page and image in each browsing tabs and upadated in each time not like Fx. I have find the add-ons on Fx that have same function like Opera’s speed viewer but it just for all tabs or not updated in each tabs (the name of add-ons is Extended… and Ex… sorry if i forgot the name). I need this because connection in Indonesia is fuckin slow.

I too prefer Opera bacause it’s faster to open it.
But, this loading problem has been solved. It’s just simply disabling the Fx and addons auto upadater that can be found in Tools->Options->Advanced->Update. Fx using at least 50Mb of RAM to just open it. I don’t know about Opera because i never checked it. But Fx can saving much space in RAM because it doesn’t have cookies.

Fx doesn’t have cookies so if you want to reopen previously opened page, it will reload it from begining. It’s a way faster to reopen previous page while i using Opera that using cookies.

Opera too have a faster rendering page than Fx (even without accelereator). Maybe i can feel this difference because i’m using a low speed internet connection. Sometimes, Fx need to dowload all the resources that need to open the full page while opera can open it partially from whatever resources it downloaded.

Other than that, Fx cannot save page directly. It must be redownloaded to save it. This to apply when i want to save image from the page. Fx redownloaded the image so it takes time just to saving a page or image. Moreover, it will reduce the bandwitch speed to do another job than just saving page. I too have encountered a site (sorry,i forgot the site) that cannot be saved in Fx but can be saved in Opera. It because the page or image cannot be downloaded to be saved. And when you using Fx w/o addons, you cannot save object like flash object.

But, nowadays, i’m beggining to move away from Opera. It’s because some site doesn’t work well in opera like this site:

http://www.indowebster.com/Mobile_Suit_Gundam_00_01_1280x720_H264_AACmp4.html

The download LINK cannot be shown in Opera. Opera show if the browser has redirected to other site. But it.s working in Fx.

Moreover, while i’m using Opera, the plugin like IDM and Flash Player in every page need to be clicked to use the plugin. For example in Mafia wars in Facebook (lol). If i want to see the properties in New York, i have to click a “Play” button to be able to see it since now it using flash object.

If anyone know how to solve that problem beyond, please help me from moving away to Fx.

Thx very much.

: google chrome2.0 very fast and light in rendering pages and javascript execution especially on google owned sites (youtube,facebok ,gmail)..thats what avg user opens 90% of time but it didnt got ad blocking and flash blocking extension but it go slow when you open multiple sites and crash often however it’s still in early phase of dev. and its ok for a new browser i m sure it will improve a lot in coming days

firefox-3.5 the old fav is now a memory and RAM eater .its bulky when you open multiple sites and slogs the system. but it is still good in rendering pages when tried with ad block plus and script blocker
espicially at those ad sites and virus prone sites

safari – i dont know why they made this for windows it was OK for MAC as they got no option , i think all good review made about this browser was tested on MAC . it’s very slow sluggish and bulky on windows .when ever i tried it i got to remove it immediately .. it got nothing and its second only to internet explorer in terms of bad rendering speed

IE8 – no matter if they make internet explorer 8 or 88 or 888 . it was made for fooling small kids who can recognize it with what is in given in elementary computer textbook .good for kids bad for user anyone using it is either due to lack of awareness or got no options this is the worst browser in terms of security speed and sluggishness . it got nothing