<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox 3 vs. Internet Explorer 7 (IE7) vs. Safari 3.1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.favbrowser.com/firefox-3-vs-internet-explorer-7-ie7-vs-safari-31/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/firefox-3-vs-internet-explorer-7-ie7-vs-safari-31/</link>
	<description>Web Browser News and Reviews.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:39:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: siti zulaikha</title>
		<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/firefox-3-vs-internet-explorer-7-ie7-vs-safari-31/#comment-92896</link>
		<dc:creator>siti zulaikha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 05:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.favbrowser.com/firefox-3-vs-internet-explorer-7-ie7-vs-safari-31/#comment-92896</guid>
		<description>please install the firefox 3 internet explorer 7 (IE7) VS safar 3.1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>please install the firefox 3 internet explorer 7 (IE7) VS safar 3.1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/firefox-3-vs-internet-explorer-7-ie7-vs-safari-31/#comment-11433</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 21:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.favbrowser.com/firefox-3-vs-internet-explorer-7-ie7-vs-safari-31/#comment-11433</guid>
		<description>Anyone review that omits Opera is worthless.  It&#039;s clearly the best browser around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone review that omits Opera is worthless.  It&#8217;s clearly the best browser around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xErath</title>
		<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/firefox-3-vs-internet-explorer-7-ie7-vs-safari-31/#comment-11407</link>
		<dc:creator>xErath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 17:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.favbrowser.com/firefox-3-vs-internet-explorer-7-ie7-vs-safari-31/#comment-11407</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s not a benchmark, that&#039;s a lame blog post. Even my grandmother knows more about browser performance than that guy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s not a benchmark, that&#8217;s a lame blog post. Even my grandmother knows more about browser performance than that guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morbus</title>
		<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/firefox-3-vs-internet-explorer-7-ie7-vs-safari-31/#comment-11405</link>
		<dc:creator>Morbus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 17:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.favbrowser.com/firefox-3-vs-internet-explorer-7-ie7-vs-safari-31/#comment-11405</guid>
		<description>Thanks for clearing that up Kelson. Still, I have that delay set to 50...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for clearing that up Kelson. Still, I have that delay set to 50&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelson</title>
		<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/firefox-3-vs-internet-explorer-7-ie7-vs-safari-31/#comment-11385</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 17:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.favbrowser.com/firefox-3-vs-internet-explorer-7-ie7-vs-safari-31/#comment-11385</guid>
		<description>&quot;Firefox purposedly delays the html rendering by 250ms for whatever purpose I don’t know.&quot;

It&#039;s to give more of the page time to load.  That way, if something comes along that changes the layout (a stylesheet gets loaded, or a long piece of text or wide image appears in a table cell, etc.), it doesn&#039;t need to start over and redo everything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Firefox purposedly delays the html rendering by 250ms for whatever purpose I don’t know.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s to give more of the page time to load.  That way, if something comes along that changes the layout (a stylesheet gets loaded, or a long piece of text or wide image appears in a table cell, etc.), it doesn&#8217;t need to start over and redo everything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morbus</title>
		<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/firefox-3-vs-internet-explorer-7-ie7-vs-safari-31/#comment-11372</link>
		<dc:creator>Morbus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 14:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.favbrowser.com/firefox-3-vs-internet-explorer-7-ie7-vs-safari-31/#comment-11372</guid>
		<description>Yup, the article is far from good, and the lack of Opera is just &quot;wot?!&quot; Also, I bet my neck they are testing Fx3 live everybody else when it comes to page loading. Firefox purposedly delays the html rendering by 250ms for whatever purpose I don&#039;t know. What I do know however, is that Firefox 3 RC1 beats Safari 3.1 in javascript (not by much), in html rendering (not by much either, since both are INCREDIBLY fast) and in dom transversal rendering (by a lot, but I don&#039;t know if my testings are very safe). But well, I&#039;m no professional in the matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, the article is far from good, and the lack of Opera is just &#8220;wot?!&#8221; Also, I bet my neck they are testing Fx3 live everybody else when it comes to page loading. Firefox purposedly delays the html rendering by 250ms for whatever purpose I don&#8217;t know. What I do know however, is that Firefox 3 RC1 beats Safari 3.1 in javascript (not by much), in html rendering (not by much either, since both are INCREDIBLY fast) and in dom transversal rendering (by a lot, but I don&#8217;t know if my testings are very safe). But well, I&#8217;m no professional in the matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/firefox-3-vs-internet-explorer-7-ie7-vs-safari-31/#comment-11369</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 13:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.favbrowser.com/firefox-3-vs-internet-explorer-7-ie7-vs-safari-31/#comment-11369</guid>
		<description>Ha! That article is very far from empirical... It finds some conclusions without really telling us how it does its experiments, then declares them irrelevant because of a particular feature of its choice, and gives marks out of five...??!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha! That article is very far from empirical&#8230; It finds some conclusions without really telling us how it does its experiments, then declares them irrelevant because of a particular feature of its choice, and gives marks out of five&#8230;??!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morghus</title>
		<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/firefox-3-vs-internet-explorer-7-ie7-vs-safari-31/#comment-11343</link>
		<dc:creator>Morghus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 10:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.favbrowser.com/firefox-3-vs-internet-explorer-7-ie7-vs-safari-31/#comment-11343</guid>
		<description>While I&#039;m a huge fan of Opera (both the browsers and the company :P), and it&#039;s the most awesome browser in the world, it doesn&#039;t give it the demographics of the browsers you mentioned. The majority is using one of those three, and articles cater to the majority as much as possible to attract readers :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I&#8217;m a huge fan of Opera (both the browsers and the company :P), and it&#8217;s the most awesome browser in the world, it doesn&#8217;t give it the demographics of the browsers you mentioned. The majority is using one of those three, and articles cater to the majority as much as possible to attract readers :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

