<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Download Firefox 4 Beta</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.favbrowser.com/download-firefox-4-beta/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/download-firefox-4-beta/</link>
	<description>Web Browser News and Reviews.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RamaSubbu SK</title>
		<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/download-firefox-4-beta/#comment-108108</link>
		<dc:creator>RamaSubbu SK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 06:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.favbrowser.com/?p=4512#comment-108108</guid>
		<description>Well done firefox!!
Browser war is getting intense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done firefox!!<br />
Browser war is getting intense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nvm</title>
		<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/download-firefox-4-beta/#comment-108086</link>
		<dc:creator>nvm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 19:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.favbrowser.com/?p=4512#comment-108086</guid>
		<description>html5test.com sucks. It randomly hands out high scores for certain tetst, hardly any for others. It also doesn&#039;t test the complete html5 spec, and includes lots of things that aren&#039;t html5.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>html5test.com sucks. It randomly hands out high scores for certain tetst, hardly any for others. It also doesn&#8217;t test the complete html5 spec, and includes lots of things that aren&#8217;t html5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ~200</title>
		<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/download-firefox-4-beta/#comment-108075</link>
		<dc:creator>~200</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 10:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.favbrowser.com/?p=4512#comment-108075</guid>
		<description>198? I&#039;ve gotten 199 here for a very long time. Perhaps there&#039;s a discrepancy between platforms?
 
Would you kindly, check where the missing point is? It would be interesting to know.
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Parsing rules&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;: &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;11 (&lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;2 Bonus points)&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Canvas&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;: &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;20&lt;/em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;
&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Video&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;: &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;22/27&lt;/em&gt;&lt;strong&gt; (&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;4 Bonus points)&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Audio&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;: &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;20&lt;/em&gt;&lt;strong&gt; (&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;3 Bonus points&lt;/em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;)&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Local devices&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;: &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;0/20&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Elements: &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;21/30&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Forms: &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;6/38&lt;/em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;
&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;User interaction&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;: &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;20/25&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Microdata&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;: &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;0/10&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Web applications&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;: &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;14&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Security&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;: &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;0/5&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Geolocation&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;: &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;10&lt;/em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;
&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;WebGL&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;: &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;10&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Communication&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;: &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;15/25&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Files&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;: &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;10/20&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Storage&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;: &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;10/20&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Workers&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;: &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;10&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>198? I&#8217;ve gotten 199 here for a very long time. Perhaps there&#8217;s a discrepancy between platforms?<br />
 <br />
Would you kindly, check where the missing point is? It would be interesting to know.</p>
<blockquote><p>
<strong>Parsing rules</strong><strong>: </strong><em>11 (</em><em>2 Bonus points)</em><br />
<em></em><strong>Canvas</strong><strong>: </strong><em>20</em><strong><br />
</strong><br />
<strong>Video</strong><strong>: </strong><em>22/27</em><strong> (</strong><strong></strong><em>4 Bonus points)</em><br />
<em></em><strong>Audio</strong><strong>: </strong><em>20</em><strong> (</strong><strong></strong><em>3 Bonus points</em><strong>)</strong><br />
<strong>Local devices</strong><strong>: </strong><em>0/20</em><br />
<em></em><strong>Elements: </strong><em>21/30</em><br />
<em></em><strong>Forms: </strong><em>6/38</em><strong><br />
</strong><br />
<strong>User interaction</strong><strong>: </strong><em>20/25</em><br />
<em></em><strong>Microdata</strong><strong>: </strong><em>0/10</em><br />
<em></em><strong>Web applications</strong><strong>: </strong><em>14</em><br />
<em></em><strong>Security</strong><strong>: </strong><em>0/5</em><br />
<em></em><strong>Geolocation</strong><strong>: </strong><em>10</em><strong><br />
</strong><br />
<strong>WebGL</strong><strong>: </strong><em>10</em><br />
<em></em><strong>Communication</strong><strong>: </strong><em>15/25</em><br />
<em></em><strong>Files</strong><strong>: </strong><em>10/20</em><br />
<em></em><strong>Storage</strong><strong>: </strong><em>10/20</em><br />
<em></em><strong>Workers</strong><strong>: </strong><em>10</em>
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tiago Sá</title>
		<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/download-firefox-4-beta/#comment-108073</link>
		<dc:creator>Tiago Sá</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 09:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.favbrowser.com/?p=4512#comment-108073</guid>
		<description>What html5test? If it&#039;s the html5test doc come thing, my nightly (that&#039;s beta2pre) got 198 points, where latest stable Chrome got 204 points, and Opera 166 points. That&#039;s an improvement from latest stable Firefox from 143 points.
 
But that test doesn&#039;t test just HTML5. There&#039;s Geolocation (which Firefox has) and WebGL, and MP3 support (which is not standard) and that sort of thing.
 
So I wanted a place that tests just HTML5... I knew one, but I forgot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What html5test? If it&#8217;s the html5test doc come thing, my nightly (that&#8217;s beta2pre) got 198 points, where latest stable Chrome got 204 points, and Opera 166 points. That&#8217;s an improvement from latest stable Firefox from 143 points.<br />
 <br />
But that test doesn&#8217;t test just HTML5. There&#8217;s Geolocation (which Firefox has) and WebGL, and MP3 support (which is not standard) and that sort of thing.<br />
 <br />
So I wanted a place that tests just HTML5&#8230; I knew one, but I forgot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: narzędzia pneumatyczne</title>
		<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/download-firefox-4-beta/#comment-108067</link>
		<dc:creator>narzędzia pneumatyczne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 08:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.favbrowser.com/?p=4512#comment-108067</guid>
		<description>So, how does it stand in html5test ? :P I cannot test it at the moment.
It looks nice, and I really like idea of searching tabs, it could be useful in my Opera (always at least two windows opened with many tabs in each). I hope Opera devs will copy&amp;improve it fast :P
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, how does it stand in html5test ? :P I cannot test it at the moment.<br />
It looks nice, and I really like idea of searching tabs, it could be useful in my Opera (always at least two windows opened with many tabs in each). I hope Opera devs will copy&amp;improve it fast :P<br />
 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

