<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Camino 1.6.4 Released</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.favbrowser.com/camino-164-released/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/camino-164-released/</link>
	<description>Web Browser News and Reviews.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: webterractive</title>
		<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/camino-164-released/#comment-31721</link>
		<dc:creator>webterractive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 02:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.favbrowser.com/camino-164-released/#comment-31721</guid>
		<description>I actually like Camino&#039;s integration into Mac OS X Firefox looks sort of alright but still gives the illusion that it doesn&#039;t fit. Problem with Firefox is that it was developed to run against Internet Explorer on the Windows platform this is why the browser looks great on Windows. But on Linux and OS X the browser still lacks polish and integrity. Camino is a good project because it incorporates the Aqua UI into the browsers controls but the only drawback is that you need to wait longer than Firefox users to get the latest GRE (1.9) as it&#039;s using 1.8.xx right now, so not all pages are rendering correctly they display minor problems with controls and buttons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually like Camino&#8217;s integration into Mac OS X Firefox looks sort of alright but still gives the illusion that it doesn&#8217;t fit. Problem with Firefox is that it was developed to run against Internet Explorer on the Windows platform this is why the browser looks great on Windows. But on Linux and OS X the browser still lacks polish and integrity. Camino is a good project because it incorporates the Aqua UI into the browsers controls but the only drawback is that you need to wait longer than Firefox users to get the latest GRE (1.9) as it&#8217;s using 1.8.xx right now, so not all pages are rendering correctly they display minor problems with controls and buttons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Torbjørn Lunde</title>
		<link>http://www.favbrowser.com/camino-164-released/#comment-30828</link>
		<dc:creator>Torbjørn Lunde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 08:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.favbrowser.com/camino-164-released/#comment-30828</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s the point with Camino when Firefox 3 actually does integrate (fairly well) into OS X?

There&#039;s even a Camino skin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the point with Camino when Firefox 3 actually does integrate (fairly well) into OS X?</p>
<p>There&#8217;s even a Camino skin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

