Comments on: Benchmark: Internet Explorer 8 (IE8) vs. Firefox 3.7, 3.6, 3.5 vs. Chrome 4, 3, 2 vs. Opera 10.5, 10.1 vs. Safari 4 http://www.favbrowser.com/benchmark-internet-explorer-8-ie8-vs-firefox-3-7-3-6-3-5-vs-chrome-4-3-2-vs-opera-10-5-10-1-vs-safari-4/ Web Browser News and Reviews. Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:39:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4 By: chris http://www.favbrowser.com/benchmark-internet-explorer-8-ie8-vs-firefox-3-7-3-6-3-5-vs-chrome-4-3-2-vs-opera-10-5-10-1-vs-safari-4/#comment-83989 chris Fri, 08 Jan 2010 07:08:01 +0000 http://www.favbrowser.com/?p=3401#comment-83989 I'm getting 812ms on Sunspider running under 3.6 RC1 Final. I’m getting 812ms on Sunspider running under 3.6 RC1 Final.

]]> By: V-2 http://www.favbrowser.com/benchmark-internet-explorer-8-ie8-vs-firefox-3-7-3-6-3-5-vs-chrome-4-3-2-vs-opera-10-5-10-1-vs-safari-4/#comment-83350 V-2 Sat, 26 Dec 2009 01:47:57 +0000 http://www.favbrowser.com/?p=3401#comment-83350 I tried Opera 10.50, very impressive results with benchmarks indeed then I measured how fast it loads real websites (with webwait com). and... rather disappointingly... it was a bit faster than 10.10, true, but still didn't even beat Firefox (3.5.6), not to mention Safari and Chromium (I use SRWare Iron, based on Chrome 3) having said that: well, it's not even alpha I tried Opera 10.50, very impressive results with benchmarks indeed

then I measured how fast it loads real websites (with webwait com).

and… rather disappointingly… it was a bit faster than 10.10, true, but still didn’t even beat Firefox (3.5.6), not to mention Safari and Chromium (I use SRWare Iron, based on Chrome 3)

having said that: well, it’s not even alpha

]]> By: max1c http://www.favbrowser.com/benchmark-internet-explorer-8-ie8-vs-firefox-3-7-3-6-3-5-vs-chrome-4-3-2-vs-opera-10-5-10-1-vs-safari-4/#comment-83276 max1c Thu, 24 Dec 2009 04:13:15 +0000 http://www.favbrowser.com/?p=3401#comment-83276 indeed there is a mistake big "O" Win [IMG=http://www.filedump.net/dumped/1261627786.png] indeed there is a mistake big “O” Win
[IMG=http://www.filedump.net/dumped/1261627786.png]

]]> By: Justin http://www.favbrowser.com/benchmark-internet-explorer-8-ie8-vs-firefox-3-7-3-6-3-5-vs-chrome-4-3-2-vs-opera-10-5-10-1-vs-safari-4/#comment-83268 Justin Thu, 24 Dec 2009 00:54:39 +0000 http://www.favbrowser.com/?p=3401#comment-83268 Tested Both Chrome 4.0 beta and Opera pre-alpha. Chrome on my computer did just a little better at it. Going to test again... http://service.futuremark.com/peacekeeper/results.action?key=2cWJ Tested Both Chrome 4.0 beta and Opera pre-alpha. Chrome on my computer did just a little better at it. Going to test again…

http://service.futuremark.com/peacekeeper/results.action?key=2cWJ

]]> By: Obs http://www.favbrowser.com/benchmark-internet-explorer-8-ie8-vs-firefox-3-7-3-6-3-5-vs-chrome-4-3-2-vs-opera-10-5-10-1-vs-safari-4/#comment-83251 Obs Wed, 23 Dec 2009 21:01:06 +0000 http://www.favbrowser.com/?p=3401#comment-83251 These results are incorrect. You can't run benchmarks in a virtual setup. You should fix it or stop doing it. See znet or betanews instead. These results are incorrect. You can’t run benchmarks in a virtual setup. You should fix it or stop doing it. See znet or betanews instead.

]]> By: cousin333 http://www.favbrowser.com/benchmark-internet-explorer-8-ie8-vs-firefox-3-7-3-6-3-5-vs-chrome-4-3-2-vs-opera-10-5-10-1-vs-safari-4/#comment-83240 cousin333 Wed, 23 Dec 2009 17:58:03 +0000 http://www.favbrowser.com/?p=3401#comment-83240 Very well done test. I found Chrome 4 not to be faster in JS (or at least, the difference is not significant). My short benchmark on Mac OSX Leopard (without the "Snow") showed (on a Mac Mini), that in SunSpider, Opera 10.5 was first, Chrome beta was second (the difference was about 8-9%, and Safari third, trailing by about 15-16%. Very well done test. I found Chrome 4 not to be faster in JS (or at least, the difference is not significant).

My short benchmark on Mac OSX Leopard (without the “Snow”) showed (on a Mac Mini), that in SunSpider, Opera 10.5 was first, Chrome beta was second (the difference was about 8-9%, and Safari third, trailing by about 15-16%.

]]> By: cousin333 http://www.favbrowser.com/benchmark-internet-explorer-8-ie8-vs-firefox-3-7-3-6-3-5-vs-chrome-4-3-2-vs-opera-10-5-10-1-vs-safari-4/#comment-83238 cousin333 Wed, 23 Dec 2009 17:40:36 +0000 http://www.favbrowser.com/?p=3401#comment-83238 Those are results from multiple people. When you give out that URL, anyone can test. If you test Opera 10.10, and later he also tests Opera 10.10 and has a better machine, then your result will be completelly overwritten. If he uses a browser, that you've not used before, the new result will be merged with the formers (like in this case). Those are results from multiple people. When you give out that URL, anyone can test. If you test Opera 10.10, and later he also tests Opera 10.10 and has a better machine, then your result will be completelly overwritten. If he uses a browser, that you’ve not used before, the new result will be merged with the formers (like in this case).

]]> By: Grrblt http://www.favbrowser.com/benchmark-internet-explorer-8-ie8-vs-firefox-3-7-3-6-3-5-vs-chrome-4-3-2-vs-opera-10-5-10-1-vs-safari-4/#comment-83235 Grrblt Wed, 23 Dec 2009 16:05:48 +0000 http://www.favbrowser.com/?p=3401#comment-83235 Different computers can get slightly different results. Different computers can get slightly different results.

]]> By: kryz http://www.favbrowser.com/benchmark-internet-explorer-8-ie8-vs-firefox-3-7-3-6-3-5-vs-chrome-4-3-2-vs-opera-10-5-10-1-vs-safari-4/#comment-83228 kryz Wed, 23 Dec 2009 13:07:44 +0000 http://www.favbrowser.com/?p=3401#comment-83228 ...and gives you false results. …and gives you false results.

]]> By: Ichan http://www.favbrowser.com/benchmark-internet-explorer-8-ie8-vs-firefox-3-7-3-6-3-5-vs-chrome-4-3-2-vs-opera-10-5-10-1-vs-safari-4/#comment-83227 Ichan Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:58:37 +0000 http://www.favbrowser.com/?p=3401#comment-83227 Damn. Someoen was busy testing all those things. Damn. Someoen was busy testing all those things.

]]>